Oficial probatorio no puede imponer como condición de libertad bajo palabra que el probando asista a Alcoholicos Anonimos
| Court: | U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals |
| Topic: | Civil Procedure, Civil Rights, Constitutional Law, Criminal Law & Procedure, Government Law, Sentencing |
| Title: | Inouye v. Kemna |
| Date: | 09/07/07 |
| Case Number: | 06-15474 |
| Summary: | In a 42 U.S.C. section 1983 action alleging violations of plaintiff's First Amendment rights by his parole officer by requiring him to attend Alcoholics Anonymous/Narcotics Anonymous meetings as a condition of his parole, summary judgment against plaintiff is reversed and remanded where defendant-parole officer was not entitled to qualified immunity because, contrary to the finding below, the law regarding the unconstitutionality of defendant's actions was clearly established at the time he supervised plaintiff's parole, and his mistake as to the law was not reasonable. |
Noticias en inglés
Sede del Colegio de Abogados de Puerto Rico
Corte Suprema, Circuitos, Distritos y Quiebras de los EU
Asosciacion que agrupa abogados defensores de los EU
Asociación que agrupa defensores legales de asistencia legal de los EU
Test y doctrina procesamiento selectivo. test casi imposible, copiando estandares federales
Sinopsis casos DP Y Constitucionlles recientes
Los Bienes de Dominio Público pueden ser traspasados a personas privadas o corporativas.
Ultimo caso TSPR sobre nuevo juicio y No proveer evidencia solicitada en Regla 95. Caso inportante para aistencia legal y abogados defensores.
No se puede procesar ni condenar por articulo 5.04 y 5.15 de la ley de armas.