> 2008

> enero

> 29

Actualidad para el 29 de enero de 2008

Derechos Religiosos de Confinado, Dieta
29 de Enero de 2008 Prisoners “do not forfeit all constitutional protections by reason of their conviction and confinement in prison.” Bell v. Wolfish, 441 U.S. 520, 545 (1979). Inmates retain the protections afforded by the First Amendment, “including its directive that no law shall prohibit the free exercise of religion.” O’Lone v. Estate of Shabazz, 482 U.S. 342, 348 (1987) (citing Cruz v. Beto, 405 U.S. 319, 322 (1972) (per curiam)). However, “ ‘[l]awful incarceration brings about the necessary withdrawal or limitation

Más información

Oficinas

Enlaces

Actualidad

Derechos Religiosos de Confinado, Dieta

Prisoners “do not forfeit all constitutional protections by reason of their conviction and confinement in prison.” Bell v. Wolfish, 441 U.S. 520, 545 (1979). Inmates retain the protections afforded by the First Amendment, “including its directive that no law shall prohibit the free exercise of religion.” O’Lone v. Estate of Shabazz, 482 U.S. 342, 348 (1987) (citing Cruz v. Beto, 405 U.S. 319, 322 (1972) (per curiam)). However, “ ‘[l]awful incarceration brings about the necessary withdrawal or limitation

© Sociedad para Asistencia Legal