Listado casos desde 10/10/2007 a 6/26/2008 incluyendo Boumediene v. Bush
Lealos en
http://www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/07slipopinion.html
| 72 | 06/26/08 | 07-320 | Davis v. Federal Election Comm’n (Incsonstitucionalidad parte ley Bipartizan Campaign reform act) | A | 554/2 |
| 71 | 06/26/08 | 07-290 | District of Columbia v. Heller (Inconstitucionalidad ley de armas de DC) | AS | 554/2 |
| 70 | 06/26/08 | 06-1457 | Morgan Stanley Capital Group Inc. v. Public Util. Dist. No. 1 of Snohomish Cty. (interpretacion contratos bajo el Federal Power Act bajo doctrina Mobile Sierra)) | AS | 554/2 |
| 69 | 06/25/08 | 07-219 | Exxon Shipping Co. v. Baker (responsabilidad corporativa por daños punitivos , casoo derrame Esson Valdez) | DS | 554/2 |
| 68 | 06/25/08 | 07-343 | Kennedy v. Louisiana (Caso sobre inprocedencia pena de muerte por violación de una menor) | K | 554/2 |
| 67 | 06/25/08 | 07-6053 | Giles v. California (Excepciones para permitir testimonio de victimas en caos de pena de muerte cuando persona murió. Este caso no cabe en las excepciones pues el no provocó o intent¢ provocar su ausencia para que no declarara) | AS | 554/2 |
| 66 | 06/25/08 | 07-411 | Plains Commerce Bank v. Long Family Land & Cattle Co. Tribunal Supremo EU revoca caso cortes Indigenas, limitando su jusrisdicción y fallando a favor banco que vendió terreno en reservación a un no indigena a precio mas bajo que indios estab dispuestos a pagar. Discrimen contra los indios mano. | R | 554/2 |
| 65 | 06/23/08 | 07-552 | Sprint Communications Co. v. APCC Services, Inc. Jurisdicción de operadores de carriers (operadores) para demandar en corte federal a compañias de larga distancia por lo que esta le adeudaba por servicios que prestaron al carriier para beneficio de la compañia de larga distancia | B | 554/1 |
| 64 | 06/23/08 | 07-330 | Circuito no puede ordenar aumentar sentencia sin apelación del estado. | G | 554/1 |
| 63 | 06/23/08 | 07-440 | Derecho a tener abogado en regla seis o en vista para arresto. veala en http://www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/07pdf/07-330.pdf | DS | 554/1 |
| 62 | 06/19/08 | 07-208 | Derecho a representarse solos a personas con enfermedades mentales. lealo en http://www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/07pdf/07-208.pdf | B | 554/1 |
| 61 | 06/19/08 | 06-1037 | Kentucky Retirement Systems v. EEOC | B | 554/1 |
| 60 | 06/19/08 | 06-923 | Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. Glenn | B | 554/1 |
| 59 | 06/19/08 | 06-1505 | Meacham v. Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory | DS | 554/1 |
| 58 | 06/19/08 | 06-939 | Chamber of Commerce of United States v. Brown | JS | 554/1 |
| 57 | 06/16/08 | 07-312 | Florida Dept. of Revenue v. Piccadilly Cafeterias, Inc. | T | 554/1 |
| 56 | 06/16/08 | 06-1181 | Dada v. Mukasey | K | 554/1 |
| 55 | 06/12/08 | 07-371 | Taylor v. Sturgell | G | 553/2 |
| 54 | 06/12/08 | 06-1204 | Republic of Philippines v. Pimentel | K | 553/2 |
| 53 | 06/12/08 | 06-1195 | Boumediene v. Bush | K | 553/2 |
| 52 | 06/12/08 | 06-7517 | Irizarry v. United States | JS | 553/2 |
| 51 | 06/12/08 | 06-1666 | Munaf v. Geren | R | 553/2 |
| 50 | 06/09/08 | 07-214 | Allison Engine Co. v. United States ex rel. Sanders | A | 553/2 |
| 49 | 06/09/08 | 07-210 | Bridge v. Phoenix Bond & Indemnity Co. | T | 553/2 |
| 48 | 06/09/08 | 06-937 | Quanta Computer, Inc. v. LG Electronics, Inc. | T | 553/2 |
| 47 | 06/09/08 | 07-474 | Engquist v. Oregon Dept. of Agriculture | R | 553/2 |
| 46 | 06/02/08 | 06-1717 | Richlin Security Service Co. v. Chertoff | A | 553/2 |
| 45 | 06/02/08 | 06-1456 | Regalado Cuellar v. United States | T | 553/2 |
| 44 | 06/02/08 | 06-1005 | United States v. Santos | AS | 553/2 |
| 43 | 05/27/08 | 06-1321 | Gomez-Perez v. Potter | A | 553/2 |
| 42 | 05/27/08 | 06-1431 | CBOCS West, Inc. v. Humphries | B | 553/2 |
| 41 | 05/27/08 | 07-77 | Riley v. Kennedy | G | 553/2 |
| 40 | 05/19/08 | 06-1646 | United States v. Rodriquez | A | 553/1 |
| 39 | 05/19/08 | 06-666 | Department of Revenue of Ky. v. Davis | DS | 553/1 |
| 38 | 05/19/08 | 06-694 | United States v. Williams | AS | 553/1 |
| 37 | 05/19/08 | 07-455 | United States v. Ressam | JS | 553/1 |
| 36 | 05/12/08 | 06-11612 | Gonzalez v. United States | K | 553/1 |
| 35 | 04/28/08 | 07-21 | Crawford v. Marion County Election Bd. | JS | 553/1 |
| 34 | 04/23/08 | 06-1082 | Virginia v. Moore | AS | 553/1 |
| 33 | 04/16/08 | 06-11543 | Begay v. United States | B | 553/1 |
| 32 | 04/16/08 | 06-11429 | Burgess v. United States | G | 553/1 |
| 31 | 04/16/08 | 07-5439 | Baze v. Rees | R | 553/1 |
| 30 | 04/15/08 | 06-1413 | MeadWestvaco Corp. v. Illinois Dept. of Revenue | A | 553/1 |
| 29 | 04/15/08 | 07-308 | United States v. Clintwood Elkhorn Mining Co. | R | 553/1 |
| 28 | 03/31/08 | 134, Orig. | New Jersey v. Delaware | G | 552/2 |
| 27 | 03/25/08 | 06-989 | Hall Street Associates, L. L. C. v. Mattel, Inc. | DS | 552/2 |
| 26 | 03/25/08 | 06-984 | Medellín v. Texas | R | 552/2 |
| 25 | 03/19/08 | 06-10119 | Snyder v. Louisiana | A | 552/2 |
| 24 | 03/18/08 | 06-713 | Washington State Grange v. Washington State Republican Party | T | 552/2 |
| 23 | 03/03/08 | 06-1498 | Warner-Lambert Co. v. Kent | PC | 552/2 |
| 22 | 03/03/08 | 06-1509 | Boulware v. United States | DS | 552/2 |
| 21 | 02/27/08 | 06-1322 | Federal Express Corp. v. Holowecki | K | 552/2 |
| 20 | 02/26/08 | 06-1221 | Sprint/United Management Co. v. Mendelsohn | T | 552/2 |
| 19 | 02/20/08 | 06-457 | Rowe v. New Hampshire Motor Transp. Assn. | B | 552/2 |
| 18 | 02/20/08 | 06-1463 | Preston v. Ferrer | G | 552/2 |
| 17 | 02/20/08 | 06-179 | Riegel v. Medtronic, Inc. | AS | 552/2 |
| 16 | 02/20/08 | 06-8273 | Danforth v. Minnesota | JS | 552/2 |
| 15 | 02/20/08 | 06-856 | LaRue v. DeWolff, Boberg & Associates, Inc. | JS | 552/2 |
| 14 | 01/22/08 | 06-9130 | Ali v. Federal Bureau of Prisons | T | 552/1 |
| 13 | 01/16/08 | 06-766 | New York State Bd. of Elections v. Lopez Torres | AS | 552/1 |
| 12 | 01/16/08 | 06-1286 | Knight v. Commissioner | R | 552/1 |
| 11 | 01/15/08 | 06-43 | Stoneridge Investment Partners, LLC v. Scientific-Atlanta, Inc. | K | 552/1 |
| 10 | 01/08/08 | 06-1164 | John R. Sand & Gravel Co. v. United States | B | 552/1 |
| 9 | 01/07/08 | 07-212 | Wright v. Van Patten | PC | 552/1 |
| 8 | 01/07/08 | 07-110 | Arave v. Hoffman | PC | 552/1 |
| 7 | 12/10/07 | 06-6330 | Kimbrough v. United States | G | 552/1 |
| 6 | 12/10/07 | 06-571 | Watson v. United States | DS | 552/1 |
| 5 | 12/10/07 | 06-7949 | Gall v. United States | JS | 552/1 |
| 4 | 12/04/07 | 06-6911 | Logan v. United States | G | 552/1 |
| 3 | 12/04/07 | 06-1287 | CSX Transp., Inc. v. Georgia State Bd. of Equalization | R | 552/1 |
| 2 | 11/05/07 | 06-1680 | Allen v. Siebert | PC | 552/1 |
| 1 | 10/10/07 | 06-637 | Board of Ed. of City School Dist. of New York v. Tom F. | PC | 552/1 |
Noticias en inglés
Sede del Colegio de Abogados de Puerto Rico
Corte Suprema, Circuitos, Distritos y Quiebras de los EU
Asosciacion que agrupa abogados defensores de los EU
Asociación que agrupa defensores legales de asistencia legal de los EU
viernes, 24/febrero/2012
CURSO AGENTES ENCUBIERTOS
Un informe de laboratorio que es preparado para presentarse en evidencia durante un proceso penal está sujeto a las exigencias de la Sexta Enmienda Federal, donde se reconoce el derecho a la confrontación.
El Tribunal Supremo resuelve que un registro sin orden efectuado como resultado del examen de olfato canino no es un registro en sentido constitucional. Se relaja el estándar de prueba requerido para el registro ulterior a la marca positiva del can, siendo suficiente una sospecha individualizada razonable de que el equipaje en cuestión tenía sustancias controladas.
Registro ilegal de estudiante en escuela (The search of Savana’s underwear violated the Fourth Amendment)